Supporters of taxes on the very rich contend that people are emerging from the COVID-19 pandemic with a bigger appetite for what they’re calling “tax justice.”
Bills announced last week in California, New York, Illinois, Hawaii, Maryland, Minnesota, Washington and Connecticut vary in their approaches to hiking taxes, but all revolve around the idea that the richest Americans need to pay more.

Jae C. Hong, Associated Press
FA homeless man pushes a shopping cart full of his belongings across an intersection in March 2013 in the Skid Row area of Los Angeles. Supporters of taxes on the very rich contend that people are emerging from the COVID-19 pandemic with a bigger appetite for “tax justice.”
All of the proposals face questionable prospects. Similar legislation has died in state legislatures and Congress. But the new push shows that the political left isn’t ready to give up on the populist argument that government can and should be used as a tool for redistributing wealth.
“Under the pandemic, while people struggled to put food on the table, we saw billionaires double their wealth,” said California Assembly Member Alex Lee, a Democrat.
The Tax Foundation, a conservative-leaning policy organization, called wealth taxes — which levy taxes not just on new income, but on a person’s total assets — “economically destructive.”
It also said in a statement that such taxes create “perverse incentives” for the rich to avoid taxes, including simply moving to states with a lower tax burden.
“Very few taxpayers would remit wealth taxes — but many more would pay the price,” the group said in a statement. Progressive Democrats, however, argue they are not seeing wealthy taxpayers leaving their states due to higher taxes.
California already taxes the wealthy more than most states. The top 1% of earners account for about half of the state’s income tax collections. But last week, Lee proposed a “wealth tax,” similar to one promoted for years by U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat.

Mark Lennihan, Associated Press
New apartment buildings are under construction in April 2018 overlooking Central Park and Gapstow Bridge in New York. Bills announced Jan. 19 in California, New York, Illinois, Hawaii, Maryland, Minnesota, Washington and Connecticut revolve around the idea that the richest Americans need to pay more in taxes.
It would impose an annual tax of 1.5% on assets of more than $1 billion and 1% on assets of $50 million or more. The new tax on wealth, not annual income, would affect an estimated 23,000 “ultra-millionaire” and 160 billionaire households, or the top 0.1% of California households, Lee said.
In Connecticut, progressive lawmakers are proposing more traditional hikes: a higher tax rate on capital gains earnings for wealthy taxpayers and higher personal income tax rates for millionaires,
“We need to ensure that the wealthiest in our state truly pay what they owe and not expect working families across our state to continue to subsidize their share,” said state Rep. Kate Farrar, a deputy majority leader in the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives.
One obstacle to such proposals is that some states where the idea might be popular are currently running budget surpluses, meaning there is little pressure to raise revenue.
Connecticut is expected to end its fiscal year with a $3 billion surplus. Hawaii is projecting a budget surplus of $1.9 billion going into the new legislative session.
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: chayanuphol / Shutterstock
The COVID-19 pandemic created unprecedented hardship for large segments of the U.S. economy. However, one unexpected bright spot was the expansion of state stabilization funds—also known as rainy day funds—driven largely by increases in tax revenue.
At the beginning of the pandemic, the economy halted, and a short-lived but steep recession ensued. Stay-at-home orders and social distancing changed the way Americans lived, and as a result, their spending habits dramatically shifted. These changes caused many small businesses to be temporarily or permanently closed, and state balance sheets declined.
But this pandemic-induced recession was fleeting. The economic downturn quickly reversed in large part due to bipartisan legislation that swiftly provided fiscal support directly to individual taxpayers, businesses, and state governments. The combination of broad fiscal stimulus and higher-than-expected tax revenue pushed state rainy day funds to a record high. During 2021, states grew their budget surpluses by more than 60%.
-
While states received direct financial support from the federal government, tax revenue was the primary contributor to state budget surpluses. State and local governments rely heavily on taxes to finance their operations. According to the Census Bureau, in 2020, total state and local government tax revenue amounted to nearly $1.9 billion—twice as much as intergovernmental revenue, which is the next largest revenue source. State and local taxes comprise several different types of taxes, but the largest sources come from sales and gross receipts, property, and individual income.
-
All but seven states tax some form of individual income, and all but nine states tax wage income. In total, individual income tax accounted for 9.9% of total state and local revenue and 22.8% of total state and local tax revenue in 2020, the most recent full year available. Today, individual income tax makes up a much larger proportion of total tax revenue than it did several decades ago in 1977, when it accounted for less than 17% of total tax revenue. While both individual income tax as a share of total revenue and as a share of total tax revenue dipped from 2019 to 2020, individual income taxes continue to be a significant revenue source for most states.
Looking ahead, many of the temporary factors that helped push state rainy day funds to record highs are projected to subside. Another issue for certain locations is that increases in remote work opportunities have encouraged residents to leave high-tax states, especially those states with high income taxes. According to the Tax Foundation, states with double-digit income taxes (such as California, New Jersey, and New York) were among the states that lost the most residents in 2021. Meanwhile, states that forgo individual income taxes altogether (such as Florida, Texas, and Nevada) reported some of the largest population increases.
To find the states that collect the most individual income tax, researchers at HowtoHome.com analyzed data from the U.S. Census Bureau. The researchers ranked states according to each state’s individual income tax revenue as a share of total revenue. Researchers also calculated individual income tax revenue as a share of total tax revenue, total individual income tax revenue, total tax revenue, and total revenue.
Here are the states that collect the most individual income tax.
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Izabela23 / Shutterstock
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total revenue: 11.1%
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total tax revenue: 21.7%
- Total individual income tax revenue: $2,359,093,000
- Total tax revenue: $10,860,932,000
- Total revenue: $21,256,402,000
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total revenue: 11.3%
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total tax revenue: 28.4%
- Total individual income tax revenue: $12,505,906,000
- Total tax revenue: $44,011,586,000
- Total revenue: $110,400,823,000
-
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total revenue: 11.3%
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total tax revenue: 26.8%
- Total individual income tax revenue: $11,704,328,000
- Total tax revenue: $43,708,584,000
- Total revenue: $103,264,080,000
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Mihai Andritoiu / Shutterstock
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total revenue: 11.8%
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total tax revenue: 30.0%
- Total individual income tax revenue: $1,744,674,000
- Total tax revenue: $5,810,994,000
- Total revenue: $14,835,230,000
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total revenue: 12.8%
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total tax revenue: 30.0%
- Total individual income tax revenue: $9,590,894,000
- Total tax revenue: $31,940,021,000
- Total revenue: $75,170,061,000
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total revenue: 12.9%
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total tax revenue: 33.0%
- Total individual income tax revenue: $6,434,162,000
- Total tax revenue: $19,495,610,000
- Total revenue: $50,023,462,000
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Mihai Andritoiu / Shutterstock
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total revenue: 12.9%
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total tax revenue: 21.9%
- Total individual income tax revenue: $15,412,766,000
- Total tax revenue: $70,318,773,000
- Total revenue: $119,261,406,000
-
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total revenue: 12.9%
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total tax revenue: 30.5%
- Total individual income tax revenue: $84,412,243,000
- Total tax revenue: $276,549,753,000
- Total revenue: $651,904,381,000
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: IVY PHOTOS / Shutterstock
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total revenue: 13.8%
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total tax revenue: 29.4%
- Total individual income tax revenue: $10,923,158,000
- Total tax revenue: $37,137,398,000
- Total revenue: $79,427,041,000
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Jon Bilous / Shutterstock
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total revenue: 14.2%
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total tax revenue: 39.1%
- Total individual income tax revenue: $8,635,691,000
- Total tax revenue: $22,065,012,000
- Total revenue: $60,946,595,000
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Jon Bilous / Shutterstock
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total revenue: 14.9%
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total tax revenue: 31.0%
- Total individual income tax revenue: $14,996,649,000
- Total tax revenue: $48,311,690,000
- Total revenue: $100,686,538,000
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total revenue: 15.8%
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total tax revenue: 26.9%
- Total individual income tax revenue: $8,177,456,000
- Total tax revenue: $30,416,426,000
- Total revenue: $51,910,360,000
-
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: ESB Professional / Shutterstock
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total revenue: 16.5%
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total tax revenue: 34.1%
- Total individual income tax revenue: $17,414,713,000
- Total tax revenue: $51,013,885,000
- Total revenue: $105,809,443,000
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total revenue: 18.1%
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total tax revenue: 33.9%
- Total individual income tax revenue: $67,963,993,000
- Total tax revenue: $200,443,056,000
- Total revenue: $376,214,893,000
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total revenue: 21.7%
- Individual income tax revenue as a share of total tax revenue: 40.5%
- Total individual income tax revenue: $17,030,628,000
- Total tax revenue: $42,033,738,000
- Total revenue: $78,310,759,000
-
chayanuphol // Shutterstock
Depending on where you live in the U.S., your state and local taxes may have shifted over the last year.
The feared decline in American spending at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic never fully materialized as stimulus and pandemic aid programs kept consumers buying and sending sales taxes into state and local government coffers.
But while the stimulus-fueled spending spree alleviated concerns about bringing in tax revenue for critical functions in local government, it also helped spur record inflation. Some states are adjusting taxes in response: Utah, for example, moved to reduce individual and corporate income tax rates for 2022.
Stacker examined data from the nonprofit Tax Foundation to see which states have recorded the biggest tax growth in the last four decades. States were ranked by the percentage-point change of each state's effective tax rate from 1980 to 2022. Ties were broken by the growth from 2021. The overall per capita burden was used if those numbers were the same.
Effective tax rates were calculated by dividing the state and local taxes residents pay by the state's share of the gross national product. Those taxes include property, sales, income, and other taxes recorded by the Census Bureau's State and Local Government Finance division.
In 2022, the national average state-local tax burden is 11.2%, unchanged from the year before. "Tax burden" is a term used to describe the effective amount of taxes each person in a state pays its government. "State-local" refers to a combination of state and local tax rates, excluding federal taxes. It can account for income and the portion of corporate taxes shifted to consumers via increased costs or lower wages.
Twenty-one states—including Oregon, Colorado, Alaska, Maryland, and Georgia—have lowered effective state-local tax rates since 1980. In Alaska, taxes on oil extraction have ensured a large portion of state taxes are footed by the business activities of nonresidents. Residents of the other 30 states have seen tax rates increase as much as three percentage points in that timeframe.
States with the largest tax growth have high effective tax rates overall, largely due to high state spending and tax payments to out-of-state governments. In Connecticut, for example, residents pay taxes to neighboring New York, while states with large tourism industries like Vermont and Hawaii export tax burdens to the rest of the U.S.
Only one state has seen tax rates rise more in the last four decades than the residents of the lush Hawaiian islands with its high cost of living and people paying a 14% effective tax rate (about $8,400 in taxes per person annually). Continue reading to see which it is.
You may also like: Cost of gold the year you were born

-
Marc Cappelletti // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: -4.3 percentage points
- Change from 2021: +0.5 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 4.6%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $2,943
-
-
Gary R Ennis Photos // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: -2.0 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.4 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 8.6%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $4,720
-
Canva
- Change from 1980: -2.0 percentage points
- Change from 2021: +0.9 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 8.8%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $5,403
-
Sean Pavone // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: -1.8 percentage points
- Change from 2021: +0.3 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 12.0%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $11,654
-
Canva
- Change from 1980: -1.3 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.4 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 10.9%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $6,231
-
ESB Professional // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: -1.0 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.2 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 8.9%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $4,862
-
-
PQK // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: -0.8 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.5 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 8.9%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $4,596
-
Brandon Burris // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: -0.7 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.1 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 9.5%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $5,156
-
quiggyt4 // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: -0.6 percentage points
- Change from 2021: +0.1 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 11.5%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $9,405
-
Hank Shiffman // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: -0.5 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.3 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 8.4%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $5,196
-
Canva
- Change from 1980: -0.4 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.8 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 7.5%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $4,691
-
-
Canva
- Change from 1980: -0.4 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.3 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 9.8%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $4,479
-
Jess Kraft // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: -0.4 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.3 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 10.8%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $6,572
-
Nolichuckyjake // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: -0.4 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.1 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 7.6%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $4,036
-
eurobanks // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: -0.3 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.6 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 11.3%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $7,680
-
Lauren Orr // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: -0.3 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.3 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 9.7%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $6,699
-
-
Kevin Ruck // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: -0.3 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.2 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 9.9%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $5,299
-
Canva
- Change from 1980: -0.2 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.4 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 9.6%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $4,669
-
Ramunas Bruzas // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: -0.2 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.3 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 11.4%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $6,948
-
Paul Brady Photography // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: -0.1 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.1 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 9.3%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $4,953
-
Sean Pavone // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: -0.1 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.1 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 10.6%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $6,723
-
-
Canva
- Change from 1980: +0.2 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.1 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 10.7%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $5,402
-
TLF Images // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: +0.3 percentage points
- Change from 2021: 0.0 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 9.0%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $4,527
-
Canva
- Change from 1980: +0.4 percentage points
- Change from 2021: 0.0 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 9.8%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $4,220
-
FotosForTheFuture // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: +0.4 percentage points
- Change from 2021: 0.0 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 9.1%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $5,406
-
Canva
- Change from 1980: +0.5 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.3 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 11.2%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $6,086
-
-
Canva
- Change from 1980: +0.5 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.2 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 9.8%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $4,585
-
Canva
- Change from 1980: +0.7 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.2 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 11.5%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $6,720
-
Canva
- Change from 1980: +0.8 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.4 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 10.0%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $5,530
-
turtix // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: +0.9 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.3 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 10.2%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $4,835
-
Canva
- Change from 1980: +0.9 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.2 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 10.5%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $5,795
-
-
Roschetzky Photography // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: +0.9 percentage points
- Change from 2021: +0.2 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 8.6%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $4,994
-
Trong Nguyen // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: +1.0 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.5 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 10.2%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $5,031
-
Canva
- Change from 1980: +1.0 percentage points
- Change from 2021: 0.0 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 9.3%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $5,030
-
Jason Finn // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: +1.0 percentage points
- Change from 2021: +0.2 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 12.1%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $6,750
-
Max Lindenthaler // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: +1.1 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.3 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 10.7%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $7,803
-
-
Canva
- Change from 1980: +1.1 percentage points
- Change from 2021: 0.0 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 9.1%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $4,762
-
Wangkun Jia // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: +1.1 percentage points
- Change from 2021: +0.1 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 9.6%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $6,593
-
f11photo // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: +1.1 percentage points
- Change from 2021: +0.2 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 13.2%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $9,648
-
Sandra Burm // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: +1.2 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.3 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 12.1%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $7,763
-
Canva
- Change from 1980: +1.5 percentage points
- Change from 2021: 0.0 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 12.4%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $6,906
-
-
Canva
- Change from 1980: +1.6 percentage points
- Change from 2021: +0.1 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 11.2%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $6,353
-
Jacob Boomsma // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: +1.8 percentage points
- Change from 2021: -0.3 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 9.6%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $5,554
-
Real Window Creative // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: +2.1 percentage points
- Change from 2021: +0.2 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 12.4%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $7,170
-
Rigucci // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: +2.1 percentage points
- Change from 2021: +0.2 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 13.5%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $10,167
-
Canva
- Change from 1980: +2.1 percentage points
- Change from 2021: +0.1 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 12.5%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $7,979
-
-
DiegoMariottini // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: +2.3 percentage points
- Change from 2021: 0.0 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 12.9%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $8,390
-
GagliardiPhotography // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: +2.7 percentage points
- Change from 2021: +0.7 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 15.9%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $12,083
-
Sean Pavone // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: +2.8 percentage points
- Change from 2021: +0.2 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 13.6%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $7,958
-
Canva
- Change from 1980: +3.1 percentage points
- Change from 2021: +0.2 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 14.1%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $8,410
-
James Kirkikis // Shutterstock
- Change from 1980: +4.9 percentage points
- Change from 2021: +0.7 percentage points
- State-local effective tax rate 2022: 15.4%
- State-local tax burden per capita: $12,151
But Hawaii state Rep. Jeanne Kapela, a Democrat, said a proposal there to increase the state’s capital gains tax is more about economic equity than raising money.
“If you look at our tax code now, it’s really the definition of economic inequality,” Kapela said.
The lowest-paid workers in many states often see a far bigger percentage of their income go to pay taxes every year than the very rich, particularly in states that don’t have a graduated income tax.
Voters in Massachusetts, which had a flat income tax, approved an amendment to the state constitution in November that sets a higher rate for those earning more than $1 million a year.
Despite optimism expressed by liberal lawmakers that 2023 could be the year, many of these proposals face an uphill battle, even in blue states with Democratic governors.
“This ‘tax the rich’ has been around before and it’s present again. And quite frankly, it never got traction before and I seriously doubt there’s an appetite for it now,” said Gary Rose, professor of political science at Sacred Heart University in Fairfield, Connecticut.
A lot of people, he said, don’t resent the rich as much as some progressive Democrats.
“I think if you polled the American people, a lot of people want to get rich themselves and it’s part of, if you will, the American Dream,” Rose said. “We’ve never really had in this country a tremendous appetite for taxing the rich because getting rich … is really part of who we are and what separates this country from many Democratic socialist countries.”
A wealth tax bill in California never even got a public hearing last year. Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat who was just elected to a second term in a landslide, has actively campaigned against efforts to increase taxes on the rich.
His opposition helped sink a 2022 ballot initiative that would have raised taxes on the rich to pay for electric vehicle charging stations and wildfire prevention.
In Connecticut, Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont, a multimillionaire, says he wants to focus his second term on reducing taxes rather than raising them.