DENVER — Earth’s protective ozone layer is slowly but noticeably healing at a pace that would fully mend the hole over Antarctica in about 43 years, a new United Nations report says.
A once-every-four-years scientific assessment found recovery in progress, more than 35 years after every nation in the world agreed to stop producing chemicals that chomp on the layer of ozone in Earth’s atmosphere that shields the planet from harmful radiation linked to skin cancer, cataracts and crop damage.

NASA
The hole in Earth's protective ozone layer is seen Oct. 5 over Antarctica. Earth’s protective ozone layer is slowly but noticeably healing at a pace that would fully mend the hole over Antarctica in about 43 years, a new United Nations report says.
“In the upper stratosphere and in the ozone hole, we see things getting better,” said Paul Newman, co-chair of the scientific assessment.
The progress is slow, according to the report presented Monday at the American Meteorological Society convention in Denver. The global average amount of ozone 18 miles high in the atmosphere won’t be back to 1980 pre-thinning levels until about 2040, the report said. And it won’t be back to normal in the Arctic until 2045.
Antarctica, where it’s so thin there’s an annual giant gaping hole in the layer, won’t be fully fixed until 2066, the report said.
Scientists and environmental advocates across the world have long hailed the efforts to heal the ozone hole — springing out of a 1987 agreement called the Montreal Protocol that banned a class of chemicals often used in refrigerants and aerosols — as one of the biggest ecological victories for humanity.
“Ozone action sets a precedent for climate action. Our success in phasing out ozone-eating chemicals shows us what can and must be done – as a matter of urgency — to transition away from fossil fuels, reduce greenhouse gases and so limit temperature increase,” World Meteorological Organization Secretary-General Prof. Petteri Taalas said in a statement.
Signs of healing were reported four years ago but were slight and more preliminary. “Those numbers of recovery have solidified a lot,” Newman said.
The two chief chemicals that munch away at ozone are in lower levels in the atmosphere, said Newman, chief Earth scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center. Chlorine levels are down 11.5% since they peaked in 1993 and bromine, which is more efficient at eating ozone but is at lower levels in the air, dropped 14.5% since its 1999 peak, the report said.
That bromine and chlorine levels “stopped growing and is coming down is a real testament to the effectiveness of the Montreal Protocol,” Newman said.
“There has been a sea change in the way our society deals with ozone depleting substances,” said scientific panel co-chair David W. Fahey, director of the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s chemical sciences lab.
Decades ago, people could go into a store and buy a can of refrigerants that eat away at the ozone, punch a hole in it and pollute the atmosphere, Fahey said. Now, not only are the substances banned but they are no longer much in people’s homes or cars, replaced by cleaner chemicals.
Natural weather patterns in the Antarctic also affect ozone hole levels, which peak in the fall. And the past couple years, the holes have been a bit bigger because of that but the overall trend is one of healing, Newman said.
This is “saving 2 million people every year from skin cancer,” United Nations Environment Programme Director Inger Andersen told The Associated Press earlier this year in an email.
A few years ago emissions of one of the banned chemicals, chlorofluorocarbon-11 (CFC-11), stopped shrinking and was rising. Rogue emissions were spotted in part of China but now have gone back down to where they are expected, Newman said.
A third generation of those chemicals, called HFC, was banned a few years ago not because it would eat at the ozone layer but because it is a heat-trapping greenhouse gas. The new report says that the ban would avoid 0.5 to 0.9 degrees (0.3 to 0.5 degrees Celsius) of additional warming.
The report also warned that efforts to artificially cool the planet by putting aerosols into the atmosphere to reflect the sunlight would thin the ozone layer by as much as 20% in Antarctica.
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: J Dennis / Shutterstock
Where people choose to live, work, and grow their families is one of the most important decisions they will make in life. Climate, cost of living, economic opportunities, or proximity to family, friends, or desirable amenities may all be factors that people consider when deciding where to live. But one factor that is often overlooked is environmental health, and in that realm, air quality is one of the most important considerations.
Air quality matters because pollution is associated with a number of health issues. High concentrations of pollutants can affect children’s development, cause or worsen respiratory problems like asthma or emphysema, and put people at heightened risk of severe health events like heart attack or stroke. And while like many health issues, air pollution has been shown to disproportionately impact low-income communities, there isn’t a meaningful correlation between levels of air pollution and cost of living at the city level. In fact, some of the highest levels of air pollution can be found in the nation’s most expensive and sought-after metropolitan areas.
Air quality has long been a problem in the U.S. For much of the 19th and 20th centuries, the growth of the economy brought heightened levels of air pollution through increased fuel combustion and industrial or chemical processes. More recently, the acceleration of global warming has contributed to drought, wildfires, and other conditions that can raise levels of particulate matter and other pollutants in the air.
-
Fortunately, air quality has also been improving over time since the passage of the Clean Air Act and creation of the Environmental Protection Agency several decades ago. Under the Clean Air Act, the EPA is required to set air quality standards (NAAQS) for certain airborne pollutants that have been deemed harmful to human health and/or the environment. To help meet these standards, the EPA can set rules around acceptable levels of pollution from sources like industry or vehicles. Over the years, these policies have had a strong track record, leading to steady decreases across all of the monitored air pollutants.
-
Despite this improvement, air pollution remains a major concern for many parts of the United States. Nearly 100 million Americans—almost one-third—live in a location that experienced unhealthy levels of air pollution in 2020, which the EPA calculates based on whether counties have pollutants at concentrations above the NAAQS. Americans most commonly experience pollution from ozone and particulate matter, but carbon monoxide and sulfur dioxide are also present at elevated levels in some communities.
-
The air quality issue is worse in some parts of the country than in others. Most notably, residents in the Southwest—especially California and Arizona—typically experience the worst air quality in any given year. Much of the reason for this can be attributed to climate and geography. The Southwest is mostly desert or other very dry land with greater susceptibility to dust storms, wildfires, and other events that increase levels of particulate matter in the air. Further, residents of major metros like Los Angeles and Phoenix are more geographically spread out, which increases dependence on cars and with it pollutants like ozone. Most of the metros where air pollution is highest are unsurprisingly found in California and elsewhere in the Southwest.
The data used in this analysis is from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis dataset. To identify the most expensive locations with the worst air quality, researchers at Filterbuy looked at the median daily air quality index (AQI) for each metropolitan area in 2020. The AQI is a broad measure of air pollution that takes into account the concentrations of major air pollutants regulated by the Clean Air Act. Higher AQI values correspond to higher levels of air pollution. Only locations with a cost of living greater than the national average, as determined by the Bureau of Economic Analysis, were included in the study.
Here are the expensive metros with the worst air quality.
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: You Touch Pix of EuToch / Shutterstock
- Median AQI: 47
- Max AQI: 174
- Unhealthy or hazardous days: 26
- Moderate Days: 115
- Good Days: 225
- Cost of living (compared to average): +17.0%
-
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock
- Median AQI: 48
- Max AQI: 143
- Unhealthy or hazardous days: 8
- Moderate Days: 152
- Good Days: 206
- Cost of living (compared to average): +5.3%
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: marekuliasz / Shutterstock
- Median AQI: 48
- Max AQI: 157
- Unhealthy or hazardous days: 19
- Moderate Days: 125
- Good Days: 222
- Cost of living (compared to average): +2.0%
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Mihai_Andritoiu / Shutterstock
- Median AQI: 48
- Max AQI: 159
- Unhealthy or hazardous days: 24
- Moderate Days: 140
- Good Days: 202
- Cost of living (compared to average): +1.2%
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Kara Jade Quan-Montgomery / Shutterstock
- Median AQI: 48
- Max AQI: 292
- Unhealthy or hazardous days: 31
- Moderate Days: 124
- Good Days: 211
- Cost of living (compared to average): +10.2%
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Terrance Emerson / Shutterstock
- Median AQI: 49
- Max AQI: 195
- Unhealthy or hazardous days: 34
- Moderate Days: 140
- Good Days: 192
- Cost of living (compared to average): +2.2%
-
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Michael Mercer / Shutterstock
- Median AQI: 51
- Max AQI: 379
- Unhealthy or hazardous days: 39
- Moderate Days: 144
- Good Days: 183
- Cost of living (compared to average): +0.6%
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: nektofadeev / Shutterstock
- Median AQI: 52
- Max AQI: 182
- Unhealthy or hazardous days: 24
- Moderate Days: 169
- Good Days: 173
- Cost of living (compared to average): +1.7%
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Scott Prokop / Shutterstock
- Median AQI: 55
- Max AQI: 189
- Unhealthy or hazardous days: 37
- Moderate Days: 173
- Good Days: 156
- Cost of living (compared to average): +1.0%
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: marchello74 / Shutterstock
- Median AQI: 56
- Max AQI: 197
- Unhealthy or hazardous days: 28
- Moderate Days: 217
- Good Days: 121
- Cost of living (compared to average): +2.8%
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Nicholas Courtney / Shutterstock
- Median AQI: 58
- Max AQI: 161
- Unhealthy or hazardous days: 34
- Moderate Days: 213
- Good Days: 119
- Cost of living (compared to average): +4.2%
-
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Andriy Blokhin / Shutterstock
- Median AQI: 60
- Max AQI: 222
- Unhealthy or hazardous days: 50
- Moderate Days: 184
- Good Days: 132
- Cost of living (compared to average): +5.2%
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Lucky-photographer / Shutterstock
- Median AQI: 71
- Max AQI: 192
- Unhealthy or hazardous days: 49
- Moderate Days: 257
- Good Days: 60
- Cost of living (compared to average): +17.9%
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: J Dennis / Shutterstock
- Median AQI: 84
- Max AQI: 235
- Unhealthy or hazardous days: 142
- Moderate Days: 164
- Good Days: 60
- Cost of living (compared to average): +18.8%
-
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Matt Gush / Shutterstock
- Median AQI: 98
- Max AQI: 576
- Unhealthy or hazardous days: 176
- Moderate Days: 152
- Good Days: 38
- Cost of living (compared to average): +7.3%