UN says ozone layer slowly healing, hole to mend by 2066
By SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer
Posted:
Updated:
DENVER (AP) — Earth’s protective ozone layer is slowly but noticeably healing at a pace that would fully mend the hole over Antarctica in about 43 years, a new United Nations report says.
A once-every-four-years scientific assessment found recovery in progress, more than 35 years after every nation in the world agreed to stop producing chemicals that chomp on the layer of ozone in Earth’s atmosphere that shields the planet from harmful radiation linked to skin cancer, cataracts and crop damage.
“In the upper stratosphere and in the ozone hole we see things getting better,” said Paul Newman, co-chair of the scientific assessment.
The progress is slow, according to the report presented Monday at the American Meteorological Society convention in Denver. The global average amount of ozone 18 miles (30 kilometers) high in the atmosphere won’t be back to 1980 pre-thinning levels until about 2040, the report said. And it won’t be back to normal in the Arctic until 2045.
Antarctica, where it’s so thin there’s an annual giant gaping hole in the layer, won’t be fully fixed until 2066, the report said.
Scientists and environmental advocates across the world have long hailed the efforts to heal the ozone hole — springing out of a 1987 agreement called the Montreal Protocol that banned a class of chemicals often used in refrigerants and aerosols — as one of the biggest ecological victories for humanity.
“Ozone action sets a precedent for climate action. Our success in phasing out ozone-eating chemicals shows us what can and must be done – as a matter of urgency — to transition away from fossil fuels, reduce greenhouse gases and so limit temperature increase,” World Meteorological Organization Secretary-General Prof. Petteri Taalas said in a statement.
Signs of healing were reported four years ago but were slight and more preliminary. “Those numbers of recovery have solidified a lot,” Newman said.
The two chief chemicals that munch away at ozone are in lower levels in the atmosphere, said Newman, chief Earth scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center. Chlorine levels are down 11.5% since they peaked in 1993 and bromine, which is more efficient at eating ozone but is at lower levels in the air, dropped 14.5% since its 1999 peak, the report said.
That bromine and chlorine levels “stopped growing and is coming down is a real testament to the effectiveness of the Montreal Protocol,” Newman said.
“There has been a sea change in the way our society deals with ozone depleting substances,” said scientific panel co-chair David W. Fahey, director of the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s chemical sciences lab.
Decades ago, people could go into a store and buy a can of refrigerants that eat away at the ozone, punch a hole in it and pollute the atmosphere, Fahey said. Now, not only are the substances banned but they are no longer much in people’s homes or cars, replaced by cleaner chemicals.
Natural weather patterns in the Antarctic also affect ozone hole levels, which peak in the fall. And the past couple years, the holes have been a bit bigger because of that but the overall trend is one of healing, Newman said.
This is “saving 2 million people every year from skin cancer,” United Nations Environment Programme Director Inger Andersen told The Associated Press earlier this year in an email.
A few years ago emissions of one of the banned chemicals, chlorofluorocarbon-11 (CFC-11), stopped shrinking and was rising. Rogue emissions were spotted in part of China but now have gone back down to where they are expected, Newman said.
A third generation of those chemicals, called HFC, was banned a few years ago not because it would eat at the ozone layer but because it is a heat-trapping greenhouse gas. The new report says that the ban would avoid 0.5 to 0.9 degrees (0.3 to 0.5 degrees Celsius) of additional warming.
The report also warned that efforts to artificially cool the planet by putting aerosols into the atmosphere to reflect the sunlight would thin the ozone layer by as much as 20% in Antarctica.
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Dragon Images / Shutterstock
While public attention on the environment has recently focused on the acceleration of global climate change, another important and closely related issue is air quality. Climate change and air pollution share many of the same causes, with reliance on fossil fuels for energy and transportation being a major contributor to both. And the two phenomena also impact and reinforce one another: climate-driven events like wildfires can increase the volume of air pollutants including particulate matter, while the emission of pollutants like ozone increases the atmosphere’s capacity to retain heat.
Air quality is a significant issue for both environmental and human health. In the environment, air pollution negatively affects soil and water quality through smog and acid rain, harming animals and plant life. The latter effects can have consequences for humans by disrupting crop yields and other sources of food, but air pollution also has direct effects on human health. High concentrations of pollutants like particulate matter, carbon monoxide, and nitrous oxides can contribute to health risks like asthma, emphysema, and cardiovascular disease.
Fortunately, while the effect of climate change remains a worrying trend for air quality, data from the Environmental Protection Agency shows that the concentration of air pollutants has shown a steep decline over the past few decades. Much of this decline can be attributed to stricter pollution regulations that were first created with the enactment of the Clean Air Act in the 1970s and amended in the 1990s. This legislation introduced restrictions on air pollution from major sources like industry, energy production, and vehicles. Since then, the concentration of major pollutants has dropped significantly, and in 2013, the concentration of every pollutant tracked by the EPA dropped below the levels established in the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for the first time.
Recent evidence suggests that COVID-19 shutdowns in 2020 also had a positive but short-lived effect on air quality. When large parts of economic and social life worldwide halted at the beginning of the pandemic, there was a sharp drop-off in major sources of pollution like industrial production and vehicle usage. This meant that the atmosphere saw a temporary reduction in emissions of pollutants. A recent UN report estimated that concentrations of particulate matter dropped by as much as 40% in some parts of the world, though much of the benefit was wiped out by extreme weather events like dust storms and wildfires later in the year.
U.S. data also confirms that there were major changes in air quality in many parts of the country during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Cities that had fewer people driving and less industrial activity saw lower levels of pollution. As a result, many cities across the country saw improvements in air quality, both in terms of Air Quality Index (AQI)—an overall assessment of air pollution levels—and in the number of days with good air quality based on AQI measurements.
To determine the locations with the biggest improvement in air quality during COVID-19, researchers at Filterbuy used data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to calculate the percentage change in median AQI from 2019 to 2020. Locations with the larger decrease in median AQI were ranked higher. In the event of a tie, the median AQI for 2020 and 2019 were used, with lower values being ranked higher. Researchers also calculated the percentage of days each year in which the air quality was considered to be good, defined as having an AQI below 50.
Here are the metros with the biggest improvement in air quality during 2020.
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock
Percentage change in median AQI (2019-2020): -6.8%
Median AQI (2020): 41
Median AQI (2019): 44
Percentage of days with good air quality (2020): 69.1%
Percentage of days with good air quality (2019): 69.6%
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: doma / Shutterstock
Percentage change in median AQI (2019-2020): -7.4%
Median AQI (2020): 50
Median AQI (2019): 54
Percentage of days with good air quality (2020): 53.0%
Percentage of days with good air quality (2019): 38.1%
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: dibrova / Shutterstock
Percentage change in median AQI (2019-2020): -7.8%
Median AQI (2020): 47
Median AQI (2019): 51
Percentage of days with good air quality (2020): 60.4%
Percentage of days with good air quality (2019): 46.3%
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock
Percentage change in median AQI (2019-2020): -8.5%
Median AQI (2020): 43
Median AQI (2019): 47
Percentage of days with good air quality (2020): 77.9%
Percentage of days with good air quality (2019): 57.3%
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Olivier Le Queinec / Shutterstock
Percentage change in median AQI (2019-2020): -8.7%
Median AQI (2020): 42
Median AQI (2019): 46
Percentage of days with good air quality (2020): 78.1%
Percentage of days with good air quality (2019): 61.1%
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock
Percentage change in median AQI (2019-2020): -9.3%
Median AQI (2020): 49
Median AQI (2019): 54
Percentage of days with good air quality (2020): 51.9%
Percentage of days with good air quality (2019): 40.5%
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock
Percentage change in median AQI (2019-2020): -9.4%
Median AQI (2020): 48
Median AQI (2019): 53
Percentage of days with good air quality (2020): 56.8%
Percentage of days with good air quality (2019): 41.1%
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Ivan Cholakov / Shutterstock
Percentage change in median AQI (2019-2020): -10.7%
Median AQI (2020): 50
Median AQI (2019): 56
Percentage of days with good air quality (2020): 51.4%
Percentage of days with good air quality (2019): 37.0%
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Zack Frank / Shutterstock
Percentage change in median AQI (2019-2020): -10.9%
Median AQI (2020): 41
Median AQI (2019): 46
Percentage of days with good air quality (2020): 79.8%
Percentage of days with good air quality (2019): 64.9%
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock
Percentage change in median AQI (2019-2020): -12.5%
Median AQI (2020): 49
Median AQI (2019): 56
Percentage of days with good air quality (2020): 53.8%
Percentage of days with good air quality (2019): 35.3%
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock
Percentage change in median AQI (2019-2020): -13.0%
Median AQI (2020): 40
Median AQI (2019): 46
Percentage of days with good air quality (2020): 77.5%
Percentage of days with good air quality (2019): 65.5%
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock
Percentage change in median AQI (2019-2020): -13.6%
Median AQI (2020): 38
Median AQI (2019): 44
Percentage of days with good air quality (2020): 89.9%
Percentage of days with good air quality (2019): 74.5%
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Jon Bilous / Shutterstock
Percentage change in median AQI (2019-2020): -14.3%
Median AQI (2020): 42
Median AQI (2019): 49
Percentage of days with good air quality (2020): 77.0%
Percentage of days with good air quality (2019): 54.8%
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: Alexandr Junek Imaging / Shutterstock
Percentage change in median AQI (2019-2020): -15.0%
Median AQI (2020): 34
Median AQI (2019): 40
Percentage of days with good air quality (2020): 94.8%
Percentage of days with good air quality (2019): 86.8%
Shutterstock
Photo Credit: f11photo / Shutterstock
Percentage change in median AQI (2019-2020): -15.4%
Median AQI (2020): 44
Median AQI (2019): 52
Percentage of days with good air quality (2020): 65.8%
Percentage of days with good air quality (2019): 44.4%
NASA via AP, File
FILE - In this NASA false-color image, the blue and purple shows the hole in Earth's protective ozone layer over Antarctica on Oct. 5, 2022.